This article has been cited by other articles in PMC. Nursing curriculum is not always overt; it can also exist covertly in the form of a hidden curriculum. This study aims to explain the factors influencing learning through the hidden curriculum in the perspective of undergraduate baccalaureate nursing students.
According to Anyon, there are four different classifications of schools. Each type of school prepares the students differently. Work is not always about getting the right answer. Teachers rarely explain to the students why they have been given the assignment.
In the middle class schools, success means getting the right answer. Effort is considered in the grading of the students' work, but mainly, the teachers are looking for the right answer.
Even though it is most important for students to get the right answer, effort is still evaluated to an extent.
Usually in these types of schools, the answer is found without an extreme amount of effort, perhaps in books, class notes, or from the teachers lesson.
Teachers will sometimes explain to the students the relation of the assignment to what they are learning. A teacher might explain the relation of the work to life, or even to a potential career path. In the affluent professional school, teachers are doing less teachers for the assignment or for the test and more teachers for the rest of the students life.
Students in this type of school have to carry out a lot more thought on their own than the students in their respective schools lower on the socio-economic ladder. Students also have to do a lot of critical thinking and analysis of ideas.
A lot of the students work relates to life or to a potential career, or at least to work that they will have further on in their academic careers. Teachers will often explain the reasons for the assignments that the students are completing.
The last type of school is the Executive Elite School. In this type of school, students are trained for success. The assignments that they are given relate directly to life and careers.
Students are sometimes asked to relate the assignments themselves. Critical thinking is a very large part of this type of school.
Students are trained to think about their potential career as early as 4th or 5th grade. If you compare a student from this type of school to a student of the same age from the working class school, you will find them vastly different.
Another big difference in these schools are the involvement of parents. In the affluent professional school, parents are heavily involved in their child's education, sometimes they even pay large amounts of money to ensure that the education that the student is receiving is top notch.
In the working class schools, parents don't care as much, and even if they do, most of the time, their is little that they can do to help their child get a good education because of financial constraints and time constraints.
Most of the parents of these children work very hard, often at two or three jobs to barely be able to provide for their children. She explains each type of school thoroughly and gives examples of how students are taught from each type of school.
She explains the processes of teaching and helps us understand why each school is the way it is. Obviously Anyon assumes that the reason for these different types of schools are because of financial reasons and a lack of resources.
I wonder why the government would let their be such a large gap in the education of children.
I would like to know if the government has any plans towards bridging this education gap. I definitely agree with the point of view of Jean Anyon.
She makes good points. She shows how the schools really operate. I agree that there is a big difference in the education of students from different economic backgrounds. This is a big reason that some students have better reasoning and analytical skills.
I think that something definitely needs to be done about this gap. It also gives a good overview of what the article is about.Social Class and the Hidden Curriculum of Work Jean Anyon, Fall , Journal of Main Argument Jean Anyon’s main argument in Social Class and the Hidden Curriculum of Work is that students receive a different education based on their community and the community the school is located in.
Jean divided the schools into four categories the working-class schools, middle-class schools, affluent. Hidden curriculum consists of concepts informally and often unintentionally taught in our school system. Social expectations of gender, language, behavior, or morals are examples of this.
The “Hidden Curriculum” helps to contribute to society by shaping young students into proper productive members of society in which those with better advantageous starts are more likely to succeed and those with fewer advantages are more submissive into entering the skilled trade workforce.
Formal curriculum planning procedures, and the hidden curriculum, which is not ordinarily addressed through regular curriculum planning but which nevertheless influences what and how students learn. It concerned with the socialization of the young. The “hidden curriculum” affects the established attitudes and values created by teachers in order to be communicated to students in the course of a learning practice.
Students effectively use the knowledge provided in classroom settings, based on the values hidden in the arrangements created by teachers in schools.
The Hidden Cirrculum The Hidden Meanings Behind Demian Essay words - 4 pages The Hidden Meanings Behind Demian Archetypes are considered to be a type of symbolic imagery derived from the past collective experience and present in the individual unconscious; at least in the ideas of Jungian psychology.
In the article entitled Jungian.