InAndrew C. C- Dereliction of duty as Commander-in-Chief.
We have entered into an age of widespread investor skepticism over nearly all aspects of corporate governance. Scandals are sapping investor confidence. With the financial shenanigans at Enron, WorldCom, Global Crossing, Tyco, Adelphia, Lucent, Xerox, Qwest, Ahold NV, Peregrine and other public companies permeating the news, many are seeking ways to improve corporate governance and, in particular, Director accountability to Shareholders.
Solutions involving better disclosure and stiffer penalties miss the big picture. Tweaking rules and regulations at the margins will only minimally improve the quality of corporate governance. The powers-that-be will vigorously seek to maintain the status quo. Almost everyone who has previously enjoyed an advantage and is suddenly forced onto a level playing field will feel cheated, treated unfairly, singled out for undeserved punishment.
Shareholders the true owners of Corporate America should have the legal right to nominate truly independent Director-candidates and cause the names of those candidates to appear on the Company's ballot. Shareholders put their faith in and entrust their money to directors to manage the company and counter a chief executive if need be.
But when things get tough, boards become captive of executives or bankers or they simply leave. The recent case of Dynegy illustrates this. Rather than stay to fix the mess the directors created, the entire Dynegy board resigned when shareholders rejected its efforts to sell the company.
The reasons are interrelated. Too often directors don't have enough skin in the game to push the company in a strong direction. They do not own substantial stock in their companies and face no risk if things go wrong.
Even if directors are given incentives to take strong action, the corporate board is not set up for this type of decision-making. Directors work part time to manage the company. It's tough getting any group to agree on anything, let alone to challenge chief executives.
Boards thus naturally tend to rely on the top executives and advisers. Board collegiality and friendships among directors and with the chief executive often also mean that no director takes a disruptive stance.
All these factors work to prevent directors from taking charge of a company or forging their own vision, a sobering thought for those who advocate greater board power.
Too often, in my experience, boardrooms are full of directors that still don't understand that they have a fiduciary duty to shareholders at large. I think we have too much in boardrooms today a feeling that you have kind of a divine right to continue on the Board without anybody challenging that assumption.
They think they deserve their steep payouts even when their performance has been far from stellar. Yet, because CEOs have influence over who gets on the board -- the only board slate offered to shareholders is the one proposed by management -- directors are careful not to offend them.
Call it the fear factor: If directors knew they stood a good chance of losing their board seats -- and the prestige and valuable business connections these provide -- unless they aligned themselves with shareholders, they might stop forking over so much and narrow the gap between what CEOs and their managers and employees get.
To get there requires changing corporate laws and practices. As a first step … shareholders gain the power to place director candidates on corporate ballots and to initiate and adopt changes in corporate charters.
Under current rules, shareholders can only pass nonbinding resolutions and must wage costly proxy fights to nominate a dissident director slate. If they can't elect the directors who represent their interests, what can they do?
Moreover, strong oversight by shareholders should reduce the need for regulatory oversight. At a minimum, the breakdown of board accountability has resulted in stock losses for investors.
At worst, it has contributed to corporate wrongdoing. Each member of the group tailors his or her view to fit the consensus. Signs of groupthink include the ignoring of expert opinion, selective use of evidence and the illusion of omnipotence.
The price of groupthink is that, at some point, reality intrudes.
|How can I support you?||The idea of liberals doing any sort of research, let alone "really good research," is nothing short of absolutely laughable.|
|IB English A: Language & Literature: Opinion column||Subscribe to our FREE email newsletter and download free character development worksheets!|
|IB English A: Language & Literature: WT1 Tips||Plotting participants self-reported height, weight, and 7 days of dietary info recorded using an online calorie counterwe can plot percentage of daily calories from fat all sources against body mass index BMI — which we calculate from the height and weight of the participant.|
|Chromosome Browser War | DNAeXplained – Genetic Genealogy||The Autosomal Goal Autosomal DNA, which tests the part of your DNA that recombines between parents every generation, is utilized in genetic genealogy to do a couple of things.|
|Tea party subtopics||Course overview Opinion column Newspapers and magazines often have columnists who write for them. Generally speaking newspapers or magazines want there to be a cult of personality surrounding these columnists to generate good sales and brand loyalty.|
More critical eyes help root out potential problems and facilitate solutions. Janis, the Yale psychologist, explained how panels of experts could make colossal mistakes.
People on these panels, he said, are forever worrying about their personal relevance and effectiveness, and feel that if they deviate too far from the consensus, they will not be given a serious role.(Click here for bottom) I i I Roman numeral for one. This is the one roman numeral that seems very natural.
For the claim that Roman numerals are efficient for . An alternative to anti-Mormon protests: Leaders of the Mormon Church urged their followers to contribute to a constitutional ban on marriage for gay families, a call that apparently resulted in the bulk of the donations to that effort in California.
This is the second installment of the blog series on TokuDB and PerconaFT data files. You can find my previous post here. In this post we will discuss some common file maintenance operations and how to safely execute these operations.
Primary brain tumors among adults are astrocytoma, meningioma, and oligodendroglioma. Brain tumor symptoms include headaches, nausea or vomiting, balance and walking problems, mood and personality changes, memory problems, and numbness or tingling in the legs.
Learn about surgery, types of brain tumors, and other treatments. Arguments that beef-lovers give and why they are hollow.
Read to know why beef-ban is right and all who are complaining are completely wrong. Dedicated to mother cow and champions of Indian culture.
The role of the media in shaping political opinion has changed dramatically over the past 60 years, as the populace has grown both more sophisticated and more fragmented.